The
reason that this is even a topic for discussion is the nature of the
spectrum of sound in music and movies. There is a LOT of low
frequency energy in both. Much more than what is in sound that common
building methods are designed for. Building codes and systems are
driven by sources like speech, traffic and light activity like
cooking and washing, and of course cost. These sources have very
little low frequency content and hence the rules and systems built
around them fail significantly at low frequency – and hence why we
always hear the “doof doof” of music, movies and games through
such walls. In fact, the standard practices can make the wall WEAKER
at low frequency.
A
cavity wall (a stud with plasterboard each side and some insulation
inside) has a resonant frequency just like a drum. At resonance the
wall has minimum soundproofing and will pass the most sound – this
area is where the graphs dip around 50 to 100 Hz. Above this, from
say 160Hz, the walls are dominated by the mass in them and adding
more plasterboard provides more soundproofing. (note that each extra
layer adds less benefit each time). At resonance however, adding mass
just changes the resonance, a bit like a thicker guitar string is as
loud as a thin one but the have a different resonance so one has a
lower pitch than the other. In the case of the wall trying to
soundproof against music or movies, where the sound energy is highest
at around 50Hz, you can see that adding layers of plasterboard adds
no extra soundproofing and actually moves the resonance to a lower
frequency where the problem is worse (louder sound in the source).
The
second graph is another way of looking at this and shows how much
sound gets through the wall. Where the “doof doof” is, the wall
with more plasterboard is actually WORSE.
So the
message is not only that adding more plasterboard may make matters
worse for soundproofing studios or home theatres, but that adding
layers more than two decreases in value rapidly as well. The second
layer doubled the cost of plasterboard for an extra 10dB, the third
layer tripled the cost but only added 7dB and the 4th
layer only added 6dB.
The
solution to the low frequency isolation of cavity walls dilemma is to
use constrained layer damping (CLD). CLD is designed to damp the
resonance and increase the soundproofing at low frequency. For more details of CLD systems click here. or contact us at www.ultrafonc.com.au


No comments:
Post a Comment